This folding screen holds many unresolved mysteries. While the motifs and the production period can be somewhat inferred, the commissioner, the artist, and the process by which it was transported to Graz, Austria, and subsequently divided into murals remain unclear.
I am particularly interested in the following two perspectives:
Perspective on Provenance and Ownership
What intrigues me most is identifying who received this folding screen and how that individual (or organization) perceived and came to own it. By delving into the story of its ownership and the circumstances surrounding its transfer, I hope to rediscover the significance and cultural value of this artwork.Perspective on Artistic Features
Another area of interest lies in the artistic characteristics of this folding screen.There are only a few surviving screens depicting Osaka during the Toyotomi period. Examples include “Osaka Castle Byobu”“Summer Siege of Osaka Byobu” “Winter Siege of Osaka Byobu” and “Kyoto-Osaka Byobu” all of which are housed in Japan. However, when compared to these works, this particular screen seems to exhibit a certain incompleteness or coarseness in its composition and depiction. Understanding whether this was an intentional expression or a result of historical or production constraints is another key aspect of my inquiry.
[Production Plan]
Using the two perspectives outlined above as starting points, I plan to create a work that supplements the background and narrative of this folding screen.
Specifically, I am considering producing a package combining a narrative text and illustrations to expand upon the historical and cultural imagination surrounding the screen.
Through this approach, I aim to convey the screen’s untapped allure, which existing materials alone cannot fully express, by combining visual and narrative elements.

KUBOTAOGUISS Tomohiro completed his Master’s degree in Printmaking at the Graduate School of Fine Arts, Tokyo University of the Arts in 2020, and is currently enrolled in the Doctoral Program at the same institution. His practice centers on the concept of cultural assets as “debts,” focusing on the temporary movement of objects, contracts, and the assumption of others’ liabilities. Often foregoing physical production, his works critically examine how art intersects with systems and economies through processes such as ownership, management, relocation, and preservation. In recent years, beginning with personal experiences and actual events, he has explored the dynamics of ownership and responsibility within communities, and the ways in which relationships of debt expand from individuals to organizations and institutions.